Patrick, Your approach is much cleaner. Let me give these a few tests then I will repost later today; forget about the callback approach for now.
cheers, jamal On Mon, 2006-04-12 at 08:58 -0500, jamal wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-12 at 14:57 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > > I think the complications come from the fact that you remeber two > > policies, but only one seems necessary. How about this (completely > > untested) patch? It simply uses increasing sequence numbers for all > > but the last entry and uses zero for the last one. > > > > I could give this a try in about 2 hours. But why dont you like the > callback approach? You have to admit, this is hairy code. > > > And the same for SAs. > > > > The SA has less things to remember, so it is easier; but i will apply > this and test it and if it meets the requirements I will look into > converting the SA to the same scheme. > > cheers, > jamal > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
