On 12/13/2018 04:55 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> It's quite strange, it doesn't match at all what I'm used to. In haproxy
> we're using splicing as well between sockets, and for medium to large
> objects we always get much better performance with splicing than without.
> 3 years ago during a test, we reached 60 Gbps on a 4-core machine using
> 2 40G NICs, which is not an exceptional sizing. And between processes on
> the loopback, numbers around 100G are totally possible. By the way this
> is one test you should start with, to verify if the issue is more on the
> splice side or on the NIC's side. It might be that your network driver is
> totally inefficient when used with GRO/GSO. In my case, multi-10G using
> ixgbe and 40G using mlx5 have always shown excellent results.
Maybe mlx5 driver is in LRO mode, packing TCP payload in 4K pages ?
bnx2x GRO/LRO has this mode, meaning that around 8 pages are used for a GRO
packets of ~32 KB,
while mlx4 for instance would use one page frag for every ~1428 bytes of
payload.
