On 12/11, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > We're using bpf_htons in test_progs.c to initialize some static > global data and I think I hit some weird case on an older compiler > which doesn't have __builtin_bswap16 (and __builtin_constant_p > expands to false). > > In this case I see: > error: implicit declaration of function '__builtin_bswap16' > > Let's explicitly use __constant_htons which should be exposed by the > linux/byteorder.h uapi header.
Forgot to mention, that using simple htons produces the following: test_progs.c:54:17: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function .eth.h_proto = htons(ETH_P_IP), > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <s...@google.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c > index 26f1fdf3e2bf..61593d319c0e 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c > @@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ static struct { > struct iphdr iph; > struct tcphdr tcp; > } __packed pkt_v4 = { > - .eth.h_proto = bpf_htons(ETH_P_IP), > + .eth.h_proto = __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP), > .iph.ihl = 5, > .iph.protocol = 6, > - .iph.tot_len = bpf_htons(MAGIC_BYTES), > + .iph.tot_len = __constant_htons(MAGIC_BYTES), > .tcp.urg_ptr = 123, > }; > > @@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ static struct { > struct ipv6hdr iph; > struct tcphdr tcp; > } __packed pkt_v6 = { > - .eth.h_proto = bpf_htons(ETH_P_IPV6), > + .eth.h_proto = __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6), > .iph.nexthdr = 6, > - .iph.payload_len = bpf_htons(MAGIC_BYTES), > + .iph.payload_len = __constant_htons(MAGIC_BYTES), > .tcp.urg_ptr = 123, > }; > > -- > 2.20.0.rc2.403.gdbc3b29805-goog >