This looks odd.  It's not really the timeout handlers job to
call nvme_end_request here.

Well.. if we are not yet LIVE, we will not trigger error
recovery, which means nothing will complete this command so
something needs to do it...

I think that we need it for rdma too..


yes we do. and we've patches in our pipe.

I'm thinking on a wider change in the error/recovery flows but might send it "as is" meanwhile.

I have it too in the pipe. Do you want to send it out or should I?

Reply via email to