User-space does not have access to the patched eBPF code, but we
need to be able to test that patches are being applied. Therefore
log distinct messages for each case that requires patching.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchi...@codethink.co.uk>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4ce049cd30a3..ea4bc796e545 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5844,6 +5844,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env
*env)
verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n");
return -EINVAL;
} else if (cnt) {
+ verbose(env, "patching in prologue\n");
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, 0, insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -5892,6 +5893,9 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env
*env)
};
cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(patch);
+ verbose(env,
+ "patching in sanitization against SSB at %d\n",
+ i + delta);
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, patch,
cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -5973,6 +5977,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env
*env)
}
}
+ verbose(env, "patching explicit ctx access at %d\n", i + delta);
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -6225,6 +6230,8 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(mask_and_mod) - (is64 ? 1 : 0);
}
+ verbose(env, "patching in divide-by-zero check at %d\n",
+ i + delta);
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta,
patchlet, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -6244,6 +6251,8 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ verbose(env, "patching implicit ctx access at %d\n",
+ i + delta);
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta,
insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -6307,6 +6316,8 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
map)->index_mask);
insn_buf[2] = *insn;
cnt = 3;
+ verbose(env, "patching in tail-call bounds check at %d",
+ i + delta);
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta,
insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -6342,6 +6353,8 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ verbose(env, "patching in map lookup at %d",
+ i + delta);
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta,
insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
--
Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd
https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street
Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom
