On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 13:25 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote: > No, we could stick with our existing setup if the stack did something > different.
But you do need full refcounting I guess. > > Because for > > the stack it wouldn't be required if it'd simply not start scanning when > > queue is disabled and stop scanning immediately when queue stop is > > requested. > > That would work, assuming there is a way to make the stack listen for > the "TX queue stopped" event (or would the ieee80211_tx_disable wrapper > take care of that?). A wrapper is what I had in mind, I don't think there's any notification for these things. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
