On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:39:01PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 14:21 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 07:42:14PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > > I said it before, and it's worth repeating. Dissolving HAL in the > sources is easy. It's just a matter of moving functions around without > serious chances of breaking anything as long as the source compiles. > The whole "HAL-based architecture" can be reshuffled and eliminated by > one person in a few days. > > Making things work properly takes years. That's what MadWifi has been > working on for a long time, using contributions and bug reports from > scores of users and developers. > > Rejecting MadWifi because it's HAL based is like throwing away a diamond > ring because it's too narrow.
I completely agree. The approach we are taking with dadwifi[1] is to use much of the existing code from madwifi and port it to the d80211 stack. Today dadwifi works in monitor, sta and ap mode. -David [1] http://madwifi.org/wiki/DadWifi > > -- > Regards, > Pavel Roskin > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Madwifi-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/madwifi-devel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
