On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 02:53:33PM -0800, Davide Libenzi
(davidel@xmailserver.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> > +static int kevent_poll_wait_callback(wait_queue_t *wait,
> > + unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
> > +{
> > + struct kevent_poll_wait_container *cont =
> > + container_of(wait, struct kevent_poll_wait_container, wait);
> > + struct kevent *k = cont->k;
> > + struct file *file = k->st->origin;
> > + u32 revents;
> > +
> > + revents = file->f_op->poll(file, NULL);
> > +
> > + kevent_storage_ready(k->st, NULL, revents);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Are you sure you can safely call file->f_op->poll() from inside a callback
> based wakeup? The low level driver may be calling the wakeup with one of
> its locks held, and during the file->f_op->poll may be trying to acquire
> the same lock. I remember there was a discussion about this, and assuming
> the above not true, made epoll code more complex (and slower, since an
> extra O(R) loop was needed to fetch events).
Indeed, I have not paid too much attention to poll/select notifications in
kevent actually. As far as I recall it should be called on behalf of process
doing kevent_get_event(). I will check and fix if that is not correct.
Thanks Davide.
> - Davide
>
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
