On 05.12.2018 22:32, David Miller wrote:
> From: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hann...@bitwise.fi>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:21:35 +0200
>
>> @@ -682,6 +682,11 @@ static void macb_set_addr(struct macb *bp, struct
>> macb_dma_desc *desc, dma_addr_
>> if (bp->hw_dma_cap & HW_DMA_CAP_64B) {
>> desc_64 = macb_64b_desc(bp, desc);
>> desc_64->addrh = upper_32_bits(addr);
>> + /* The low bits of RX address contain the RX_USED bit, clearing
>> + * of which allows packet RX. Make sure the high bits are also
>> + * visible to HW at that point.
>> + */
>> + dma_wmb();
>> }
>
> I agree with that dma_wmb() is what should be used here.
>
> We are ordering CPU stores with DMA visibility, which is exactly what
> the dma_*() are for.
>
> If it doesn't work properly on some architecture's implementation of dma_*(),
> those should be fixed rather than papering over it in the drivers.
>
Ok, agree. This driver uses rmb()/wmb() all over the place with regards to
DMA descriptors updates, so I tough it might be a reason for that.
Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea
