[PATCH net] bpf: uninitialized variables in test code

[Dan Carpenter]

Smatch complains that if bpf_test_run() fails with -ENOMEM at the
begining then the "duration" is uninitialized.  We then copy the
unintialized variables to the user inside the bpf_test_finish()
function.  The functions require CAP_SYS_ADMIN so it's not really an
information leak.

Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index c89c22c49015..49304192a031 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const 
union bpf_attr *kattr,
        bool is_l2 = false, is_direct_pkt_access = false;
        u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
        u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
-       u32 retval, duration;
+       u32 retval, duration = 0;
        int hh_len = ETH_HLEN;
        struct sk_buff *skb;
        struct sock *sk;
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const 
union bpf_attr *kattr,
        u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
        struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
        struct xdp_buff xdp = {};
-       u32 retval, duration;
+       u32 retval, duration = 0;
        void *data;
        int ret;
 
-- 
2.11.0