On 11/27/2018 08:57 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On 11/27/2018 05:09 PM, 배석진 wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> nobody concern about this? minor problem? :( >> we saw hundreds of not closed tcp session with FIN_WAIT1 and LAST_ACK. > > These sessions should have a timer, and eventually disappear. > > Do you have a test to demonstrate the issue ? > > I know Lorenzo wrote tests, so presumably new tests are needed. BTW your patch title is confusing. You are changing tcp_abort(), not tcp_close()
- FW: [Resource Leak] Suggesting patch for tcp_close 배석진
- Re: FW: [Resource Leak] Suggesting patch for tcp_clos... Eric Dumazet
- Re: FW: [Resource Leak] Suggesting patch for tcp_... Eric Dumazet
- RE:(2) FW: [Resource Leak] Suggesting patch for tcp_c... 배석진