Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com> writes: >> > I'd say it sounds reasonable to include XDP in the normal traffic >> > counters, but having the detailed XDP-specific counters is quite >> > useful >> > as well... So can't we do both (for all drivers)? >> > > > What are you thinking ? > reporting XDP_DROP in interface dropped counter ? > and XDP_TX/REDIRECT in the TX counter ? > XDP_ABORTED in the err/drop counter ? > > how about having a special XDP command in the .ndo_bpf that would query > the standardized XDP stats ?
Don't have any strong opinions on the mechanism; just pointing out that the XDP-specific stats are useful to have separately as well :) -Toke
