Kernel test robot (l...@intel.com) reports a compilation error at
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg534913.html
introduced by commit 838e96904ff3 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_func_info").
If CONFIG_BPF is defined and CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is not defined,
the following error will appear:
kernel/bpf/core.c:414: undefined reference to `btf_type_by_id'
kernel/bpf/core.c:415: undefined reference to `btf_name_by_offset'
When CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is not defined,
let us define stub inline functions for btf_type_by_id()
and btf_name_by_offset() in include/linux/btf.h.
This way, the compilation failure can be avoided.
Fixes: 838e96904ff3 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_func_info")
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>
---
include/linux/btf.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
Changelog:
v1 -> v2:
. Two functions should be static inline functions
if CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is not defined.
diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index 7f2c0a4a45ea..8c2199b5d250 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -46,7 +46,21 @@ void btf_type_seq_show(const struct btf *btf, u32 type_id,
void *obj,
struct seq_file *m);
int btf_get_fd_by_id(u32 id);
u32 btf_id(const struct btf *btf);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
const struct btf_type *btf_type_by_id(const struct btf *btf, u32 type_id);
const char *btf_name_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset);
+#else
+static inline const struct btf_type *btf_type_by_id(const struct btf *btf,
+ u32 type_id)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+static inline const char *btf_name_by_offset(const struct btf *btf,
+ u32 offset)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+#endif
#endif
--
2.17.1
