On 10/09/2018 07:11 PM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> 
> Hence the reason we sent this as an RFC a couple of weeks ago.  We got no 
> response, so followed up with this patch in order to get some input. Do you 
> have any suggestions for how we might accomplish this in a less ugly way?

I dunno, maybe a modern way for all these very specific needs would be to use 
an eBPF
hook to implement whatever combination of RPS/RFS/what_have_you

Then, we no longer have to review what various strategies are used by users.

Reply via email to