On 2018-10-08 2:11 a.m., Al Viro wrote:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:55:52PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 06:45:15 +0100
Er... Both are due to missing in the very beginning of the series (well, on
top of "net: sched: cls_u32: fix hnode refcounting") commit
All dependencies like this must be explicitly stated.
And in such situations you actually should wait for the dependency to
get into 'net', eventually get merged into 'net-next', and then you
can submit the stuff that depends upon it.
Not the way this was done.
Point (and this commit is simply missing - it's not that it went into
net). FWIW, this was simply "this is what the breakage is caused by",
not an attempt to amend the submission or anything like that...
My bad. I was wondering why it compiled for me. There is no dependency
on the single patch that went to net. I will submit an updated version.
cheers,
jamal
