On 10 Aug 2018, at 16:48, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 10 Aug 2018, at 16:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:59:30 -0400
Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]> wrote:
+ if (bs.bytes >= bs_hw.bytes && bs.packets >= bs_hw.packets) {
+ print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", _SL_);
+ print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", prefix);
+ print_lluint(PRINT_ANY, "sw_bytes",
+ "Sent software %llu bytes",
+ bs.bytes - bs_hw.bytes);
+ print_uint(PRINT_ANY, "sw_packets", " %u pkt",
+ bs.packets - bs_hw.packets);
+ }
+ }
+
+ print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", _SL_);
+ print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s", prefix);
+ print_lluint(PRINT_ANY, "hw_bytes", "Sent hardware %llu bytes",
+ bs_hw.bytes);
What does the output look like?
See the two +’es below:
$ tc -s filter show dev enp3s0np0 parent ffff:
filter protocol ip pref 1 flower chain 0
filter protocol ip pref 1 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
eth_type ipv4
dst_ip 2.0.0.0
src_ip 1.0.0.0
ip_flags nofrag
in_hw
action order 1: mirred (Egress Redirect to device eth1) stolen
index 1 ref 1 bind 1 installed 0 sec used 0 sec
Action statistics:
Sent 534884742 bytes 8915697 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0
requeues 0)
+ Sent software 187542 bytes 4077 pkt
+ Sent hardware 534697200 bytes 8911620 pkt
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
cookie 89173e6a44447001becfd486bda17e29
Hi Stephen, anything else required for this patch to be accepted?
FYI the kernel side of this patch has been excepted on net-next.
Cheers,
Eelco
