On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:14:10AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Anyway - we got into this discussion because of all the extra recursion > stuff I was adding. With the change suggested by David we don't need > that now at all, so I guess it'd be better to propose a patch if you (or > perhaps I will see a need later) need such a facility for multiple > messages or multiple message levels?
Yep! Thanks, Marcelo