From: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:19:05 -0700
> On 9/19/18 5:56 AM, Mike Manning wrote: >> From: Robert Shearman <rshea...@vyatta.att-mail.com> >> >> There is no way currently for an IPv6 client connect using a loopback >> address in a VRF, whereas for IPv4 the loopback address can be added: >> >> $ sudo ip addr add dev vrfred 127.0.0.1/8 >> $ sudo ip -6 addr add ::1/128 dev vrfred >> RTNETLINK answers: Cannot assign requested address >> >> So allow ::1 to be configured on an L3 master device. In order for >> this to be usable ip_route_output_flags needs to not consider ::1 to >> be a link scope address (since oif == l3mdev and so it would be >> dropped), and ipv6_rcv needs to consider the l3mdev to be a loopback >> device so that it doesn't drop the packets. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Shearman <rshea...@vyatta.att-mail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Manning <mmann...@vyatta.att-mail.com> >> --- >> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 1 + >> net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 3 ++- >> net/ipv6/route.c | 3 ++- >> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > > Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> > > Been on my to-do list for a while. Thanks for the patch. This resolves, > for example, a harmless error message from the 'host' command from > bind9-host-9.10.3 which probes for dscp support via the loopback > address. e.g., > > $ host www.google.com > ../../../../lib/isc/unix/net.c:581: sendmsg() failed: Network is unreachable Applied, thanks everyone.