On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:40:45AM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:28 AM Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:03:56PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Yishai Hadas <yish...@mellanox.com>
> > >
> > > Set uid as part of RQ commands so that the firmware can manage the
> > > RQ object in a secured way.
> > >
> > > That will enable using an RQ that was created by verbs application
> > > to be used by the DEVX flow in case the uid is equal.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yish...@mellanox.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com>
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> > > include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 6 +++---
> > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c
> > > index 04f72a1cdbcc..0ca68ef54d93 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/qp.c
> > > @@ -540,6 +540,17 @@ int mlx5_core_xrcd_dealloc(struct mlx5_core_dev
> > > *dev, u32 xrcdn)
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mlx5_core_xrcd_dealloc);
> > >
> > > +static void destroy_rq_tracked(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u32 rqn, u16
> > > uid)
> > > +{
> > > + u32 in[MLX5_ST_SZ_DW(destroy_rq_in)] = {0};
> > > + u32 out[MLX5_ST_SZ_DW(destroy_rq_out)] = {0};
> >
> > = {} is the preferred version of this, right?
> >
> > {0} explicitly initializes the first element to zero and only works if
> > the first element happens to be something integral..
> >
>
> Both are perfectly ok in our scenarios.
> I remember one of the syntaxes yielded a statistic checker warning, i
> don't remember which syntax and what static checker :) ..
{0} will throw a 'missing-field-initializers' compiler warning,
however it recognizes '= {}' as an idom meaning 'zero everything' and
does not throw a warning.
Jason
