From: Alaa Hleihel <[email protected]>
When modifying hairpin SQ, instead of checking if the next state equals
to MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY, we compare it against the MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY enum
value.
The code worked since both of MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY and MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY
have the same value today.
This patch fixes this issue.
Fixes: 18e568c390c6 ("net/mlx5: Hairpin pair core object setup")
Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
index dae1c5c5d27c..d2f76070ea7c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int mlx5_hairpin_modify_sq(struct mlx5_core_dev
*peer_mdev, u32 sqn,
sqc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(modify_sq_in, in, ctx);
- if (next_state == MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY) {
+ if (next_state == MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY) {
MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_rq, peer_rq);
MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_vhca, peer_vhca);
}
--
2.17.1
