Dawid Ciezarkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday, 19 October 2006 21:04, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>> It would seem to me that extending an existing mode would be more
>> desirable than adding yet another mode to worry about. I don't even
>> like the fact that there are as many as there are, but I understand why
>> they are there.
>
>Ack. I will probably update wrr bonding patch to replace rr mode.
Also, if acceptance into the mainline is your ultimate goal, the
ioctl control interface will be a very difficult sell. You'd want to
look into some other control mechanism, most likely an additional sysfs
entry.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
