On 05/09/18 03:23, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> So would you agree it's fair to add
> Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
> ?
Sure. Though I don't think it needs backporting, as it's a conservative
bug (i.e. it merely prevents pruning, but that's safe security-wise).
> How about patch like the following:
> ------------
> From 422fd975ed78645ab67d2eb50ff6e1ff6fb3de32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 19:13:44 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] bpf/verifier: fix verifier instability
>
> Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
> Debugged-by: Edward Cree <ec...@solarflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ec...@solarflare.com>
