On 09/03/18 12:58, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Don't you want to go one step further and incorporate the logic that xgenet,
>> tg3, gianfar and others have? That is: look at the currently advertised
>> parameters, determine what changed, and re-start auto-negotiation as a
>> result of it being enabled and something changed?
> 
> Hi Florian
> 
> Given the number of changes i'm making, over a so many different
> drivers which i cannot test, i wanted to try to keep the changes
> KISS. That way we are more likely to spot errors during review.  So i
> would prefer to be done later, unless it actually makes review
> simpler...

That's fine, but you still need to keep the test for phydev->autoneg in
xgene I believe. Since all of these drivers appear to be doing the same
thing, that's why I suggested moving this into the helper directly.
-- 
Florian

Reply via email to