From: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:00:23 -0700

> The current cpsw usage for cpsw-phy-sel is undocumented but is used for
> all the boards using cpsw. And cpsw-phy-sel is not really a child of
> the cpsw device, it lives in the system control module instead.
> 
> Let's document the existing usage, and improve it a bit where we prefer
> to use a phandle instead of a child device for it. That way we can
> properly describe the hardware in dts files for things like genpd.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>

Applied.

Reply via email to