From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:22:11 -0400

> That's actually how I originally coded it. :)  But then it occurred to 
> me that if you've already been waiting for a full clock tick, the 
> marginal CPU savings of waiting longer will not be great.  Which is why 
> I chose the value of 2 ticks so you're guaranteed to have waited at 
> least one full tick.

Fair enough, patch applied, thanks.

BTW, like some other's using Thunderbird to send patches,
lines with nothing but spaces are being corrupted into
fully empty lines.

In fact, in your patch some trailing whitespace of existing
code lines were also eliminated by Thunderbird, further
corrupting the patch.

I fixed this all up by hand, but please try to get this fixed
up for future submissions.

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to