On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> The smap_start_sock() and smap_stop_sock() are each protected under
> the sock->sk_callback_lock from their call-sites except in the case
> of sock_map_delete_elem() where we drop the old socket from the map
> slot. This is racy because the same sock could be part of multiple
> sock maps, so we run smap_stop_sock() in parallel, and given at that
> point psock->strp_enabled might be true on both CPUs, we might for
> example wrongly restore the sk->sk_data_ready / sk->sk_write_space.
> Therefore, hold the sock->sk_callback_lock as well on delete. Looks
> like 2f857d04601a ("bpf: sockmap, remove STRPARSER map_flags and add
> multi-map support") had this right, but later on e9db4ef6bf4c ("bpf:
> sockhash fix omitted bucket lock in sock_close") removed it again
> from delete leaving this smap_stop_sock() instance unprotected.
>
> Fixes: e9db4ef6bf4c ("bpf: sockhash fix omitted bucket lock in sock_close")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubrav...@fb.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> index 94a324b..921cb6b 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> @@ -1786,8 +1786,11 @@ static int sock_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
> void *key)
> if (!psock)
> goto out;
>
> - if (psock->bpf_parse)
> + if (psock->bpf_parse) {
> + write_lock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
> smap_stop_sock(psock, sock);
> + write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
> + }
> smap_list_map_remove(psock, &stab->sock_map[k]);
> smap_release_sock(psock, sock);
> out:
> --
> 2.9.5
>
