On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 14:59 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > But we will have to convert d80211 to cfg80211 anyway, > so it will depend on the way rate limiting is implemented in cfg80211 > in the end.
I'd think it should be more the other way round with d80211/cfg80211 doing whatever makes most sense... johannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
