On 8/7/2018 09:42, Camille Bordignon wrote:
Le lundi 06 août 2018 à 15:45:29 (-0700), Alexander Duyck a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:59 AM, Camille Bordignon
<camille.bordig...@easymile.com> wrote:
Hello,

Recently we experienced some issues with intel NIC (I219-LM and I219-V).
It seems that after a wire reconnection, auto-negotation "fails" and
link speed drips to 10 Mbps.

 From kernel logs:
[17616.346150] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link is Down
[17627.003322] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link is Up 10 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow 
Control: None
[17627.003325] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 enp0s31f6: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO


$ethtool enp0s31f6
Settings for enp0s31f6:
         Supported ports: [ TP ]
         Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
                                 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
                                 1000baseT/Full
         Supported pause frame use: No
         Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
         Supported FEC modes: Not reported
         Advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
                                 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
                                 1000baseT/Full
         Advertised pause frame use: No
         Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
         Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
         Speed: 10Mb/s
         Duplex: Full
         Port: Twisted Pair
         PHYAD: 1
         Transceiver: internal
         Auto-negotiation: on
         MDI-X: on (auto)
         Supports Wake-on: pumbg
         Wake-on: g
         Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
                                drv probe link
         Link detected: yes


Notice that if disconnection last less than about 5 seconds,
nothing wrong happens.
And if after last failure, disconnection / connection occurs again and
last less than 5 seconds, link speed is back to 1000 Mbps.

[18075.350678] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link is Down
[18078.716245] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow 
Control: None

The following patch seems to fix this issue.
However I don't clearly understand why.

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 3ba0c90e7055..763c013960f1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -5069,7 +5069,7 @@ static bool e1000e_has_link(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
         case e1000_media_type_copper:
                 if (hw->mac.get_link_status) {
                         ret_val = hw->mac.ops.check_for_link(hw);
-                       link_active = !hw->mac.get_link_status;
+                       link_active = false;
                 } else {
                         link_active = true;
                 }

Maybe this is related to watchdog task.

I've found out this fix by comparing with last commit that works fine :
commit 0b76aae741abb9d16d2c0e67f8b1e766576f897d.
However I don't know if this information is relevant.

Thank you.
Camille Bordignon

What kernel were you testing this on? I know there have been a number
of changes over the past few months in this area and it would be
useful to know exactly what code base you started out with and what
the latest version of the kernel is you have tested.

Looking over the code change the net effect of it should be to add a 2
second delay from the time the link has changed until you actually
check the speed/duplex configuration. It is possible we could be
seeing some sort of timing issue and adding the 2 second delay after
the link event is enough time for things to stabilize and detect the
link at 1000 instead of 10/100.

- Alex

We've found out this issue using Fedora 27 (4.17.11-100.fc27.x86_64).

Then I've tested wth a more recent version of the driver v4.18-rc7 but
behavior looks the same.

Thanks for you reply.

Camille Bordignon
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
intel-wired-...@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

I've agree with Alex. Let's try add 2s delay after a link event. Please, let us know if it will solve your problem. Also, I would like recommend try work with different link partner and see if you see same problem.

Reply via email to