On Tuesday 17 October 2006 14:04, Martin Schiller wrote: > On Monday, October 16, 2006 9:02 AM, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > I wrote something like this a couple of years ago: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=103666165629419&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=106089519611631&w=2 > > > > There wasn't a whole lot of external interest, and my need for it > > disappeared, so I never really finished it, and there's a couple of > > unfixed bugs, > > Lennert's patch does nearly exactly the way how I tried to do it earlier by > myself and after porting the patch to kernel 2.6.15.4 and 2.6.11.12, which > I am currently using, it works great. > > The only change I've made is that I don't want to send the SYN-ACK only > with the first write() on the socket, because in my application the > requesting client is also the one who starts sending data. So I introduced > an ioctl() which simply runs tcp_confirm() to send the SYN-ACK.
Well, did you solve Lennert problem if the final (third packet of three packet TCP establishment handshake) packet is missing ? It seems no timer will fire and tell you the socket is not usable... Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
