On 30/07/2018 3:10 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:56:44 -0700 Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com> wrote:
+int mlx5e_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev, int n, struct xdp_frame **frames,
+ u32 flags)
+{
+ struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct mlx5e_xdpsq *sq;
+ int drops = 0;
+ int sq_num;
+ int i;
+
+ if (unlikely(!test_bit(MLX5E_STATE_OPENED, &priv->state)))
+ return -ENETDOWN;
+
+ if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ sq_num = smp_processor_id();
+
+ if (unlikely(sq_num >= priv->channels.num))
+ return -ENXIO;
+
+ sq = &priv->channels.c[sq_num]->xdpsq;
+
+ if (unlikely(!test_bit(MLX5E_SQ_STATE_ENABLED, &sq->state)))
+ return -ENETDOWN;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ struct xdp_frame *xdpf = frames[i];
+ struct mlx5e_xdp_info xdpi;
+
+ xdpi.dma_addr = dma_map_single(sq->pdev, xdpf->data, xdpf->len,
+ DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+ if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(sq->pdev, xdpi.dma_addr))) {
+ drops++;
I think you are missing a xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf) here.
Thanks for spotting this!
I'll fix.
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ xdpi.xdpf = xdpf;
+
+ if (unlikely(!mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame(sq, &xdpi))) {
+ xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
+ drops++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (flags & XDP_XMIT_FLUSH)
+ mlx5e_xmit_xdp_doorbell(sq);
+
+ return n - drops;
+}