On 30/07/2018 3:10 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:56:44 -0700 Saeed Mahameed <[email protected]> wrote:+int mlx5e_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev, int n, struct xdp_frame **frames, + u32 flags) +{ + struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); + struct mlx5e_xdpsq *sq; + int drops = 0; + int sq_num; + int i; + + if (unlikely(!test_bit(MLX5E_STATE_OPENED, &priv->state))) + return -ENETDOWN; + + if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK)) + return -EINVAL; + + sq_num = smp_processor_id(); + + if (unlikely(sq_num >= priv->channels.num)) + return -ENXIO; + + sq = &priv->channels.c[sq_num]->xdpsq; + + if (unlikely(!test_bit(MLX5E_SQ_STATE_ENABLED, &sq->state))) + return -ENETDOWN; + + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { + struct xdp_frame *xdpf = frames[i]; + struct mlx5e_xdp_info xdpi; + + xdpi.dma_addr = dma_map_single(sq->pdev, xdpf->data, xdpf->len, + DMA_TO_DEVICE); + if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(sq->pdev, xdpi.dma_addr))) { + drops++;I think you are missing a xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf) here.
Thanks for spotting this! I'll fix.
+ continue; + } + + xdpi.xdpf = xdpf; + + if (unlikely(!mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame(sq, &xdpi))) { + xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf); + drops++; + } + } + + if (flags & XDP_XMIT_FLUSH) + mlx5e_xmit_xdp_doorbell(sq); + + return n - drops; +}
