From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:12:13 -0700
> I rejected this because I don't consider "sticky routes" when link is down > a bug. This definitely sounds like it is in the realm of userspace policy. The routing daemon should adjust the routes, as appropriate, if a link loses it's IF_RUNNING and it wants to use a backup route. IFF_RUNNING does not cause routes to get flushed, only IFF_UP events do. Changing routes based upon IFF_RUNNING state is a userland policy issue. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
