On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 19:01:52 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:54:52 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Hmm... in practice we could steal top bits of the size parameter for > > some flags, since it seems to be limited to values < 256 today? Is it > > worth it? > > > > It would look something along the lines of: > > Something like that, yes. I'll leave to Daniel to review how much sense > it makes from the BPF side.
Can we take this as a follow up through the bpf-next tree or do you want us to respin as part of this set?
