On 06/27/2018 04:07 PM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote: > I'm failing to see how... There is a memset() in sock.c:1147 clearing all the > 8 > bytes that we later use to (explicitly) assign each member of the struct. > Aren't > the 2 extra bytes sanitized, then? What have I missed? Nothing, it seems I missed the memset(), it was not seen in the context of your patch and I have not checked the whole function.
- [PATCH v1 net-next 04/14] net: packet: Hook into ti... Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
- [PATCH v1 net-next 12/14] igb: Only call skb_tx_tim... Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
- Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 12/14] igb: Only call s... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 12/14] igb: Only ca... Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
- [PATCH v1 net-next 11/14] igb: Add support for ETF ... Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
- [PATCH v1 net-next 05/14] net/sched: Allow creating... Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
- [PATCH v1 net-next 01/14] net: Clear skb->tstamp... Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
- [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] net: Add a new socket opt... Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
- Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] net: Add a new s... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] net: Add a n... Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
- Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] net: Add... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] net: Add a new s... kbuild test robot
- Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] net: Add a new s... Willem de Bruijn
- Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] net: Add a n... Willem de Bruijn
- Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] net: Add... Jesus Sanchez-Palencia