On 06/15/2018 02:05 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 06/15/2018 12:30 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 05:01:06AM -0700, William Tu wrote: >>> Make the printting of bpf xfrm tunnel better and >>> cleanup xfrm state and policy when xfrm test finishes. >> LGTM. The subject tag actually meant s/bpf-net/bpf-next/? >> >> It makes sense to be in bpf-next but I think bpf-next is still closed. >> Please repost later. > > But given this fixes up missing cleanup of xfrm policy/state that was > added earlier as part of the test, I think bpf would be fine. (Subject > is a bit confusing indeed either bpf resp. net tree or bpf-next was > meant.)
Ok, took it in, thanks William!
