On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:25:12 +0200 Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote:
> Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 05:42:31AM CEST, step...@networkplumber.org wrote: > >The net failover should be a simple library, not a virtual > >object with function callbacks (see callback hell). > > Why just a library? It should do a common things. I think it should be a > virtual object. Looks like your patch again splits the common > functionality into multiple drivers. That is kind of backwards attitude. > I don't get it. We should rather focus on fixing the mess the > introduction of netvsc-bonding caused and switch netvsc to 3-netdev > model. To me, callbacks are worse than a simple notifier. Is there some other agenda going on? do you want to get rid of network notifier. Netvsc is not switching to 3 device model in near future. Too much userspace is wrapped around it already.
