On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 10:59:30 +0300, Paul Blakey wrote: > Maybe we can apply my patch logic of still trying the egress dev if the > block has a single device, and not shared. Is that ok with you?
I don't remember that patch but sounds pretty bad. > You're patch seems good as an add on, but the egress hw device (sw1np0) > would go over the tc actions and see if it can offload such rule (output > to software lo device) and would fail anyway. Ack, I'm not trying to solve the skip_sw problem. It's a hard one.
