On 06/02/2018 09:08 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:29:08PM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Hi Ilias,
>
>
>> Second, Thanks a lot for your great work. I'm still testing it with different
>> use cases and trying to consolidate my reply for all questions.
>>
>> All, thanks for your comments.
>
> Hi Grygorii
>
> Something i've said to Ilias already. I would recommend you don't try
> to cover all your uses cases with the first version. Keep it simple
> and clean, don't do anything controversial and get it merged. Then add
> more features one by one. We can then discuss any odd ball features
> while being able to look at the complete system, driver, switchdev and
> the network stack.
>
yes. It definitely no problem from my side, except basic customer use-cases
simply not working without sw0p0, at least with current LKML :(
And I just have to look a little bit in the future as selected approach
expected to be extended on future SoC (and other parts of existing SoCs -
ICSS-G SW switch)
where we going to have more features, like TSN, EST and packet Policing and
Classification.
And I very, very appreciated for your (and all others) time and comments.
Thank you.
--
regards,
-grygorii
