Le 01/06/2018 à 19:57, David Miller a écrit : [snip] > I think the 0xfff8 value might come from the requirement that ipv6 > fragments need to be a multiple of 8 bytes long. > Oh, thanks for the explanation!
- [PATCH net 0/2] ip[6] tunnels: fix mtu calculations Nicolas Dichtel
- [PATCH net 1/2] ip_tunnel: restore binding to ifaces ... Nicolas Dichtel
- Re: [PATCH net 1/2] ip_tunnel: restore binding to... Ido Schimmel
- Re: [PATCH net 1/2] ip_tunnel: restore bindin... Nicolas Dichtel
- [PATCH net v2 0/2] ip[6] tunnels: fix mtu cal... Nicolas Dichtel
- [PATCH net v2 1/2] ip_tunnel: restore bin... Nicolas Dichtel
- [PATCH net v2 2/2] ip6_tunnel: remove mag... Nicolas Dichtel
- Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] ip[6] tunnels: fix... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] ip[6] tunnels... Nicolas Dichtel
- [PATCH net 2/2] ip6_tunnel: remove magic mtu value 0x... Nicolas Dichtel
