On 06/01/2018 12:56 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 05/31/2018 06:00 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:32 PM John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Wei,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report and fix. It would be better to fix the
>>> root cause so that IPv6 works as intended.
>>>
>>> I'm testing the following now,
>>>
>>> Author: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com>
>>> Date:   Thu May 31 14:38:59 2018 -0700
>>>
>>>     sockmap: fix crash when ipv6 sock is added by adding support for IPv6
>>>
>>>     Apparently we had a testing escape and missed IPv6. This fixes a crash
>>>     where we assign tcp_prot to IPv6 sockets instead of tcpv6_prot.
>>>
>>>     Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>
>> Hi John
>>
>> In any case, please forward correct attribution for Wei's work, and
>> syzbot 'Reported-by'
> 
> Will send update with tags in a moment.
> 
>>
>> Are you sure you are handling IPv4 mapped in IPv6 sockets as well ?
>>
>
> No, will look into it. Although I didn't see any code to handle it
> in the ./net/tls case either so if there is some issue with this it
> could possibly exist in both ULPs. I guess if ipv4 mapped ipv6
> changes prot or callbacks then we could stomp on it.
>

Will need a v2 to address this, by adding a check to only work on
ESTABLISHED sockets we resolve this issue and the one noted in the
TLS ULP side as well.

Thanks a lot Eric.


Reply via email to