On Wed, 30 May 2018 15:18:02 -0700 Song Liu <liu.song....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Overall, this set looks good to me. The only suggestion I have is to add more > documentation on the expected behavior of XDP_XMIT_FLUSH in netdevice.h > (as part of 01/08). I do see your point, as the behavior of XDP_XMIT_FLUSH is actually more a "doorbell" functionality. I still choose to call it "flush", because it is replacing a function called ndo_xdp_flush, and providing the exact same code-function as ndo_xdp_flush. (IMHO it should have been called ndo_xdo_doorbell). Any opinions about renaming XDP_XMIT_FLUSH to XDP_XMIT_DOORBELL? If you look at virtio_net and tun usage, the effect is a wakeup (virtqueue_kick and sk_data_ready). Still I like the name "doorbell" better than "wakeup", as it also maps to NIC usage which often call this "doorbell" or "tail" pointer update. -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
