From: Or Gerlitz <ogerl...@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 19:24:48 +0300

> When dealing with ingress rule on a netdev, if we did fine through the
> conventional path, there's no need to continue into the egdev route,
> and we can stop right there.
> 
> Not doing so may cause a 2nd rule to be added by the cls api layer
> with the ingress being the egdev.
> 
> For example, under sriov switchdev scheme, a user rule of VFR A --> VFR B
> will end up with two HW rules (1) VF A --> VF B and (2) uplink --> VF B
> 
> Fixes: 208c0f4b5237 ('net: sched: use tc_setup_cb_call to call per-block 
> callbacks')
> Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerl...@mellanox.com>

Applied and queued up for -stable.

> As I wrote in [1], we are asking this patch to go into net and 
> stable >= 4.15 but not carried into net-next.

Please send me a revert with a detailed commit message when this
gets merged into net-next.

Thanks.

Reply via email to