On 05/21/2018 10:35 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ah yes, sequence number wrapping. I was thinking I needed to deal with > that, and then got sidetracked and forgot about it. Will fix. > > Other than that, do you agree that this approach to SACK and header > handling can work? Unfortunately this does not handle dsack (RFC 2883, and 3708) properly, I believe.
