Even if commit 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports") indicated
that registering a devlink instance for unused ports is not a problem, and this
is true, this can be confusing nonetheless, so let's not do it.

Fixes: 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports")
Reported-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
---
 net/dsa/dsa2.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index adf50fbc4c13..47725250b4ca 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -258,11 +258,13 @@ static void dsa_tree_teardown_default_cpu(struct 
dsa_switch_tree *dst)
 static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
 {
        struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
-       int err;
+       int err = 0;
 
        memset(&dp->devlink_port, 0, sizeof(dp->devlink_port));
 
-       err = devlink_port_register(ds->devlink, &dp->devlink_port, dp->index);
+       if (dp->type != DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+               err = devlink_port_register(ds->devlink, &dp->devlink_port,
+                                           dp->index);
        if (err)
                return err;
 
@@ -293,7 +295,8 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
 
 static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp)
 {
-       devlink_port_unregister(&dp->devlink_port);
+       if (dp->type != DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+               devlink_port_unregister(&dp->devlink_port);
 
        switch (dp->type) {
        case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
-- 
2.14.1

Reply via email to