Even if commit 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports") indicated
that registering a devlink instance for unused ports is not a problem, and this
is true, this can be confusing nonetheless, so let's not do it.

Fixes: 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports")
Reported-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
---
 net/dsa/dsa2.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index adf50fbc4c13..cc45a8ca45fb 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -262,13 +262,14 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
 
        memset(&dp->devlink_port, 0, sizeof(dp->devlink_port));
 
+       if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+               return 0;
+
        err = devlink_port_register(ds->devlink, &dp->devlink_port, dp->index);
        if (err)
                return err;
 
        switch (dp->type) {
-       case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
-               break;
        case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
        case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
                err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
@@ -293,11 +294,12 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
 
 static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp)
 {
+       if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+               return;
+
        devlink_port_unregister(&dp->devlink_port);
 
        switch (dp->type) {
-       case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
-               break;
        case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
        case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
                dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
-- 
2.14.1

Reply via email to