Even if commit 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports") indicated that registering a devlink instance for unused ports is not a problem, and this is true, this can be confusing nonetheless, so let's not do it.
Fixes: 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports") Reported-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> --- net/dsa/dsa2.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c index adf50fbc4c13..cc45a8ca45fb 100644 --- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c +++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c @@ -262,13 +262,14 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp) memset(&dp->devlink_port, 0, sizeof(dp->devlink_port)); + if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED) + return 0; + err = devlink_port_register(ds->devlink, &dp->devlink_port, dp->index); if (err) return err; switch (dp->type) { - case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED: - break; case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU: case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA: err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp); @@ -293,11 +294,12 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp) static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp) { + if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED) + return; + devlink_port_unregister(&dp->devlink_port); switch (dp->type) { - case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED: - break; case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU: case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA: dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp); -- 2.14.1