On 05/15/2018 04:11 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Sun, May 13, 2018 at 01:20:22AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann escreveu: >> [ +Arnaldo ] >> >> On 05/11/2018 01:21 PM, YueHaibing wrote: >>> bpf_object__open()/bpf_object__open_buffer can return error pointer or NULL, >>> check the return values with IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in bpf__prepare_load and >>> bpf__prepare_load_buffer >>> >>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com> >>> --- >>> tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c | 6 +++--- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> This should probably be routed via Arnaldo due to the fix in perf itself. If >> there's no particular preference on which tree, we could potentially route it >> as well via bpf with Acked-by from Arnaldo, but that is up to him. Arnaldo, >> any preference? > > I'm preparing a pull req right now, and working a bit on perf's BPF > support, so why not, I'll merge it, thanks,
Sounds good, thanks Arnaldo! > - Arnaldo
