On 05/14/2018 03:45 PM, stran...@codeaurora.org wrote: > On 2018-05-11 17:16, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > >>> Hmm, no, we absolutely need to fix GSO instead. >>> >>> Think of a bonding device (or any virtual devices), your patch wont avoid >>> the crash. > > Hi Eric. Can you clarify what you mean by "fix GSO?" Is that just having the > GSO path work > regardless of whether or not SG is enabled for the device? >
Yes. GSO is a fallback, and must work all the time, not panic.
