On 5/2/18 12:53 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > So this fixes the issue for me. To reproduce: > > # ip -6 address add 2001:db8::1/64 dev dummy0 > # ip -6 address add 2001:db8::1/64 dev dummy1 > > This reproduces the issue because due to above commit both local routes > are considered siblings... :/ > > local 2001:db8::1 proto kernel metric 0 > nexthop dev dummy0 weight 1 > nexthop dev dummy1 weight 1 pref medium > > I think it's best to revert the patch and have Thomas submit a fixed > version to net-next. I was actually surprised to see it applied to net.
ugly side effect of the way ecmp routes are managed in IPv6. I think revert is the best option for now. I need to look into a bug report related to v6 and route replace with ecmp. I'll take a look at why the above is consolidated as well. Those should not become an ecmp route.
