On 4/30/18 3:15 PM, Thomas Winter wrote: > It is valid to have static routes where the nexthop > is an interface not an address such as tunnels. > For IPv4 it was possible to use ECMP on these routes > but not for IPv6. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Winter <[email protected]> > Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> > Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <[email protected]> > Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[email protected]> > --- > include/net/ip6_route.h | 3 +-- > net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) >
Interesting. Existing code inserts the dev nexthop as a separate route. Change looks good to me. Acked-by: David Ahern <[email protected]>
