On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 16:47 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Michael Chan wrote:
> > +   /* Chip might not be fitted with firmware.  Some Sun onboard
> > +    * parts are configured like that.  So don't signal the timeout
> > +    * of the above loop as an error, but do report the lack of
> > +    * running firmware once.
> > +    */
> > +   if (i >= 100000 &&
> > +       !(tp->tg3_flags2 & TG3_FLG2_NO_FWARE_REPORTED)) {
> > +           tp->tg3_flags2 |= TG3_FLG2_NO_FWARE_REPORTED;
> > +
> > +           printk(KERN_INFO PFX "%s: No firmware running.\n",
> > +                  tp->dev->name);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> 
> You need to actually return failure, for the failure case.
> 
> Currently, this function is written to return an error code, but always 
> returns zero.
> 
It's actually not a failure.  It was decided that we'll just print a
message once and continue.  Some SUN onboard chips do not have firmware.

In the next patch (6/9) where we support a new chip with a new firmware
polling method, it can return -ENODEV.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to