From: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:33:04 +1100
> The documentation for rhashtable_walk_peek() wrong. It claims to > return the *next* entry, whereas it in fact returns the *previous* > entry. > However if no entries have yet been returned - or if the iterator > was reset due to a resize event, then rhashtable_walk_peek() > *does* return the next entry, but also advances the iterator. > > I suspect that this interface should be discarded and the one user > should be changed to not require it. Possibly this patch should be > seen as a first step in that conversation. > > This patch mostly corrects the documentation, but does make a > small code change so that the documentation can be correct without > listing too many special cases. I don't think the one user will > be affected by the code change. > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com> Please mention the "one user" explicitly in both locations where you refer to it in this commit message. Thank you.
